John Irving's Queen Esther Evaluation – An Underwhelming Companion to His Earlier Masterpiece
If certain writers enjoy an imperial period, in which they reach the pinnacle consistently, then U.S. author John Irving’s ran through a run of several long, satisfying works, from his late-seventies breakthrough The World According to Garp to the 1989 release His Owen Meany Book. Such were rich, witty, compassionate books, connecting protagonists he refers to as “outliers” to societal topics from feminism to termination.
After His Owen Meany Novel, it’s been waning results, except in size. His most recent book, the 2022 release His Last Chairlift Novel, was nine hundred pages in length of subjects Irving had delved into more effectively in previous works (mutism, restricted growth, transgenderism), with a lengthy screenplay in the heart to pad it out – as if padding were required.
Therefore we look at a latest Irving with caution but still a small spark of hope, which glows brighter when we discover that Queen Esther – a just four hundred thirty-two pages long – “returns to the universe of The Cider House Rules”. That mid-eighties book is one of Irving’s very best works, set mostly in an institution in the town of St Cloud’s, managed by Dr Wilbur Larch and his assistant Homer.
The book is a letdown from a writer who once gave such delight
In The Cider House Rules, Irving discussed termination and belonging with richness, wit and an total compassion. And it was a important book because it left behind the themes that were turning into tiresome tics in his works: the sport of wrestling, bears, Vienna, the oldest profession.
Queen Esther starts in the made-up community of New Hampshire's Penacook in the twentieth century's dawn, where Mr. and Mrs. Winslow take in young ward Esther from St Cloud’s. We are a a number of decades ahead of the events of His Earlier Novel, yet the doctor is still familiar: already dependent on anesthetic, adored by his staff, beginning every speech with “Here in St Cloud’s …” But his role in this novel is confined to these initial parts.
The couple worry about raising Esther well: she’s from a Jewish background, and “in what way could they help a young girl of Jewish descent find herself?” To tackle that, we jump ahead to Esther’s later life in the 1920s. She will be part of the Jewish emigration to the region, where she will become part of the paramilitary group, the Jewish nationalist armed force whose “mission was to protect Jewish towns from opposition” and which would later establish the basis of the IDF.
These are huge topics to take on, but having brought in them, Irving backs away. Because if it’s disappointing that the novel is not actually about the orphanage and Dr Larch, it’s even more disheartening that it’s also not focused on the main character. For causes that must relate to story mechanics, Esther turns into a gestational carrier for a different of the family's children, and delivers to a male child, the boy, in 1941 – and the bulk of this book is Jimmy’s narrative.
And now is where Irving’s fixations come roaring back, both regular and particular. Jimmy goes to – naturally – the city; there’s mention of evading the Vietnam draft through self-harm (Owen Meany); a canine with a meaningful title (the dog's name, recall the canine from The Hotel New Hampshire); as well as grappling, sex workers, authors and penises (Irving’s throughout).
The character is a more mundane figure than the heroine promised to be, and the supporting figures, such as students Claude and Jolanda, and Jimmy’s instructor Eissler, are one-dimensional also. There are several nice scenes – Jimmy deflowering; a confrontation where a few thugs get battered with a crutch and a tire pump – but they’re brief.
Irving has not once been a delicate writer, but that is is not the issue. He has always reiterated his ideas, foreshadowed story twists and let them to accumulate in the viewer's thoughts before bringing them to completion in lengthy, jarring, entertaining scenes. For case, in Irving’s novels, physical elements tend to be lost: remember the oral part in Garp, the digit in His Owen Book. Those absences reverberate through the story. In the book, a key character is deprived of an limb – but we just discover thirty pages later the end.
She returns toward the end in the story, but merely with a final impression of concluding. We never learn the entire account of her experiences in the region. This novel is a letdown from a writer who previously gave such joy. That’s the downside. The positive note is that His Classic Novel – I reread it in parallel to this novel – even now stands up excellently, four decades later. So pick up it as an alternative: it’s much longer as the new novel, but far as great.